There are 6 main variants of the Airbus A300 family of aircraft. The A300-600 (A300B4) is one of them. Making things a bit more complicated is the fact that there are 6 sub-variants of just the 600/B4. It makes my head hurt just thinking about the entire lineup, but all you need to know is this:

What you’ll find below are my detailed side view templates of the A300-600. Not only the passenger version, but the freighter version as well.

Other versions will follow (if the pain ever goes away).

Side view templates of the Airbus A300-600 and A300-600F

Note: all of the aircraft illustrated below feature General Electric engines. The A300B4-600 was the most recent model built, and therefore, finding decent reference material was not so difficult. The GE engines seemed to be the most popular on these final airframes (as far as my non-scientific research could tell), so I just went with that.

Passenger version

The passenger version of this aircraft features three main boarding doors per side, along with one emergency exit located between doors number two and three.

Side profile illustration of a white Airbus A300B4-600R featuring General Electric engines  over a blank background with and without the landing gear deployed
All white, all right. Some aircraft just look good naked, and the A300B4-600 is one of ’em.

There are 10 windows between doors number one and two, 30 between door number two and the emergency exit, and 16 between the emergency exit and door number three. Doing the math, that’s 56 windows per side.

Technical side profile line drawing of an Airbus A300B4-600R featuring General Electric engines  over a white background with and without the landing gear deployed
Yep. I was definitely having flashbacks to my A330-200 templates as I was illustrating this line drawing. They look very similar!

Freighter version

Other than a large cargo door located at the very front of the fuselage, are no structural differences between the passenger version and the freighter version. All but two of the windows were eliminated, as were boarding door two and the emergency exit. Apparently emergencies aren’t a thing on cargo aircraft?

Side profile illustration of a white Airbus A300-600F featuring General Electric engines  over a blank background with and without the landing gear deployed
The freighter version is a little too naked without a splash of color IMHO. This needs to be slathered with the UPS livery ASAP!
Technical side profile line drawing of an Airbus A300-600F over a blank background with and without the landing gear deployed
I love the details revealed in the line drawing. Fact: being regulated to “flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog sh*t out Hong Kong” wouldn’t be so bad on one of these bad boys.

A brief history of the A300

Announced in 1969 and launched in 1974 with Air France, the A300 was especially significant in that it was the world’s first twin-engine widebody aircraft. Way back then, four-engined aircraft were the norm. I can only imagine how cutting-edge and advanced this design must have been. It was like nothing else at the time.

Here in modern times, the twin-engine widebody configuration is pretty much the de facto standard for medium to long haul aircraft. Airbus (and the entire aviation community) may not have known it at the time, but the A300 laid the groundwork for air travel as we know it today.

Visual differences between the A300 and A310

Compared to the A310 (the shorter-fuselage variant of the A300), it’s hard to tell the difference unless you’re looking at both side by side. The design language of both is distinctly “Airbus” with a pointy nose and raked vertical stabilizer. It’s kind of surprising to me that they weren’t categorized as the same family of aircraft.

A300 vs A310 visual differences
Compared to my A310-300 template, the A300-600 looks essentially the same in a side profile view. Only the nerdiest of nerds will notice the difference in wing size.

The only major differences:

  • The A300 has a larger wing and a longer fuselage
  • Not all A300s and A310s share the same tail section

Similar Posts

22 Comments

  1. Wow nice job man and also do u think you can make the NASA 747 and the AN225 with space shuttles please I really needed that and good job on the MD-11 (MD-11F) have a good one Scott my friend

    1. Thanks! I do believe that’s the first request ever had for the space shuttle. I will admit that sounds like fun. It’s pretty far down on my list of things to do though…

    1. Thanks Ryan! I seem to recall already doing that one – but maybe I didn’t? It makes my head hurt trying to keep track of all the different configurations lol.

    1. Yes! Maybe. 🙂 I’ve actually got to get started on my AN225 template though (the one that I’ve been promising forever). That might come first.

    1. That one is fairly high on my priority list, but unfortunately there’s not a whole lot of good reference material available for it yet. Hopefully soon!

    1. Definitely one of the most interesting requests I’ve received in a while! I had no idea what that was until I Googled it just now lol.

      1. And after the cargo, you can make some old ones, like DC-3, DC-6, Lockheed Constellation, Lockheed Model 10 Electra, Boeing 247 and Convair 340?

        1. Other than the AN-225, the DC-3 is my highest requested aircraft at the moment. I’ll tackle that one after the Antonov!

    1. How is it different than an A320-200? I’m guessing the differences are small, so it should be a fairly easy one for me to add to the collection.

      1. Alright thanks, and I’m that guy who sent you airline liveries that i made from paint 3D if ya don’t remember a month ago.

  2. I would also like to see the A300B2-200 and A300B4-200 versions. They have slightly different shaped General Electric engines and no wingtips.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *